Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6844 14_Redacted
Original file (NR6844 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 155

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

2 March 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
1 material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo date

ece 31 6d

  

December 2014, a copy of which was provided to you on 31 January 2015,
ana is being provided to you now.

comment

    
 

\eeeenaceia

Accordingly, your application

of the members of the panel will

   

t is regretted that the cir ces of your case are such that
1 ion cannot be t n. You are entitled to have the B
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within on
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in

this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a

presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. NR6844-

 

Q

0
RK

Executive Di

P.

osure: NPC memo dtd 31 Dec 1

7

O

En

Q

L

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3464 14

    Original file (NR3464 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4261 14

    Original file (NR4261 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DJC Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion Furnished by NPC memo 1811 Pers- 835/070 dated 30 December 2014, a COpy of which was provided to you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7313 14

    Original file (NR7313 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4128 14

    Original file (NR4128 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR4128-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3411 14

    Original file (NR3411 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased former husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Decket No, NR3411-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6902 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR6902 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NR6902-14 3 Mar 15 This is in reference to your application for orrection of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1 5 BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and poli ‘es. New evidence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8557 14

    Original file (NR8557 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2015. Documenta considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR059 15

    Original file (NR059 15.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, ‘sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2015. Additionally, the Board considered your response to the Advisory Opinion dated 24 February 2015. : After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7501 14

    Original file (NR7501 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NR7501-14 17 Mar 15 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552, A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8685 14

    Original file (NR8685 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.